Comments on: John McCain Promises to Re-criminalize Homosexuality

By: Gretchen Talor

Gretchen Talor — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 07:09:10 +0000

With havin so much content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright infringement? My website has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my permission. Do you know any ways to help prevent content from being stolen? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

By: Davein SF

Davein SF — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:07:18 +0000

Don’t think for a moment that Lawrence V. Texas would survive a McCain Presidency It wouldnt. The only shiny bauble the wingnut rapture-rights wants almost as much as dancing the grave of Roe v. Wade is to make Gay & Lesbians criminals again. And let’s not kid ourselves, if a McCain Court would be unable to overturn Roe, undoing Lawrence would be a suitable consolation prize for Jimmy “Focus on the Facism & Funding” Dobson.

Sarah Palin’s church is hosting a “Love Won Out” pray-away- the-Gay conference. She sought to bad “Daddy’s Roomate” from her public library. These people are insane they are rabid anti gay browshirts that given the chance will round you up and put you in reparitive therapy camps.

Think I am overstating things? How many of you 8 yrs ago would have thought the US Goverment would torture people or eavesdrop on your cell phone calls?

By: LGBT for Obama .com » Message to Log Cabin - “You Gotta Be Kiddin”

Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:03:28 +0000

[...] about which current members of the Supreme Court he would not have nominated if he were President, McCain rattled off the names Ginzberg, Breyer, Souter and Stevens. These are the only sitting members of the court who can be counted on to rule on the side of [...]

By: J. Clarence

J. Clarence — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:35:24 +0000

I have to agree with everything that was said already. While all of those justices are liberal, that specific case was likely not the only reason he would not have supported them. There have been other cases that those justices have ruled on that would have not made them the favorites on the flip-flopping Republican favorite list.

By: Charlie

Charlie — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:34:07 +0000

Ditto Jerome’s thoughts. Don’t get carried away. We know McCain is bad. Don’t ruin your cred.

By: Jerome

Jerome — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:43:30 +0000

Hey Alex, I’m an Obama democrat and I’m doing what it takes here to make it a win for Democrats. However, you can’t say in your title that John McCain promised to recriminalize homosexuality. Never happened. Just choosing not to have instated those particular justices affects a lot of liberal decisions that were made—from abortion rights to respecting Guantanamo detainees. We almost always have a 5-4 split somewhere, and McCain chose the most liberal justices.

But saying that he won’t pick liberal justices is a FAR FAR cry from SAYING he would “recriminalize homosexuality” and you do Mr. Obama and LGBT democrats a disservice by using fearmongering to get votes.

Don’t add your spin. Just tell us what Obama is doing for LGBT people and that will help our decisions. There’s no need to demonize McCain–or put words in his mouth. He has plenty of bad statements you could capitalize on and print instead.