Obamaphobia

By Richard J. Rosendall
First published September 11, 2008 in Bay Windows

I’m sick of the phony reasons some gay people give for opposing Barack Obama. I am not talking about my friends in Log Cabin Republicans, who prefer John McCain for broader ideological reasons. I am talking about angry Hillary Clinton supporters.

For example, Sirius OutQ talk-radio host Larry Flick, still upset that Clinton had not won the Democratic nomination, slammed Obama on Aug. 28 for opposing same-sex marriage. Yet Clinton holds the same position on marriage — except that she would only repeal Article 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, whereas Obama favors total repeal.

Flick challenged Sirius Left host Mark Thompson, an African American minister and activist with whom I’ve worked for years, on his support for Obama. Flick expressed outrage that Obama accepted help from “blatant, aggressive homophobes” Donnie McClurkin and Illinois state Sen. James Meeks. Yet Clinton enjoyed support from homophobic Bishop Eddie Long of Lithonia, Ga., and from former D.C. City Council member Vincent Orange, who as a mayoral candidate in 2006 called his opponents morally unfit for supporting marriage equality.

Flick said Obama “has not voted in favor of these issues on gay rights in any fashion.” In fact, the Human Rights Campaign’s Congressional Scorecard for the 109th Congress shows that Clinton and Obama had identical LGBT voting records and earned an HRC score of 89. This included, among other things, voting against the Federal Marriage Amendment. I have not yet seen the scorecard for the 110th, but the Congressional Record shows that in 2007, Clinton and Obama were co-introducers of the transgender-inclusive Hate Crimes Prevention Act — later incorporated into the National Defense Authorization Act — and voted “Aye” in a key cloture vote.

Flick acknowledged that he would probably vote for Obama given the alternatives, but “I won’t allow any of his people to come on my show.” He even claimed that Democratic Party leaders decided a year ago to back Obama for the nomination because they never thought Hillary could win. This conspiracy mongering ignores the fact that the Clintons were a dominant force in the party while Obama was given little chance. During the primaries, Clinton landed her share of blows, as shown by McCain’s use of them in his commercials. Clinton and Obama have reconciled, and she has hit the campaign trail for him. As Thompson suggested, her supporters should consider the larger stakes and not let the election be reduced to a clash of personalities.

Flick repeatedly said to Thompson, “You’re not a gay man, you don’t understand.” Thompson was admirably restrained. He stated that blacks and gays share a “mutual struggle,” and that comparing oppressions was a mistake. He noted that he himself has differences with Obama, “but we would be better off holding a President Obama accountable than a President McCain.” Thompson also sang the praises of Clinton, describing the exhilarating moment during the roll call when she moved to nominate Obama by acclamation. He said it was time to move forward together: “Today is bigger than him.”

We should heed Thompson’s advice. McCain’s eagerness to distract voters from the issues is evident in his vice-presidential choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who opposes Clinton on nearly every issue. Former Hewlett-Packard Chairman and CEO Carly Fiorina, in response to journalistic scrutiny of Palin, stated, “The Republican Party will not stand by while Sarah Palin is subjected to sexist attacks.”

Oh really? Ten years ago, McCain joked, “Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno.” How does a man who could say such a thing about a political opponent’s teenage daughter dare have his surrogates cry sexism over press examination of his running mate’s qualifications — or declare family matters off-limits, even as he parades the family in question before the cameras? How is an out-of-wedlock pregnancy nobody’s business, while it’s okay to accuse gay people of undermining families? How in the world does this show McCain putting his country ahead of his political ambition?

Our intelligence is repeatedly insulted as GOP wordmeisters put just about anything on the teleprompter that will get a roar from the crowd. Given the recent tone of McCain’s campaign, his promise to bring the country together is as credible as President Bush’s old line, “I’m a uniter, not a divider.”

As Obama said on Sept. 6, “They must think you’re stupid.” Prove them wrong.

Copyright © 2008 by Richard J. Rosendall. All rights reserved. Rick can be contacted at rrosendall@starpower.net.

Tags: , , , , , ,

7 Responses to “Obamaphobia”

  1. Shanon Booser Says:

    Hi It’s a wonderful post. You have gained a new subscriber. The clearness in your post is simply spectacular and i can assume you are an expert on this subject.

  2. Yuri Ermoline Says:

    I’m wondering in the event anyone knows what Canada’s immigration requirements are. As an older fart, I probably don’t have “skills” they want. They’ll clearly make sure I’m fleeing a were unable country, looking for decent health care.

  3. Clarissa @ Get HP Online Says:

    Hello there, just doing some browsing for my HP site. Can’t believe the amount of information out there. Wasn’t exactly what I was looking for, but cool site. Cya later.

  4. free tattoo stencils Says:

    Hello from Russia! Need to it be effortless for me to pages and use a submit in your weblog using the link to you? I’ve tried emailing you concerning this dilemma nonetheless it seems i cant reach you, please response as soon as have a moment, thanks.

  5. Vonda Karman Says:

    details Too bad there arent many blogs of this calibre today. Wow is all I can say. Thanks again.. weblog

  6. investing for profit real estate Says:

    investing for profit real estate…

    [...]LGBT for Obama .com » Obamaphobia[...]…

  7. Tattoo Thailand Says:

    Tattoo Thailand…

    [...]LGBT for Obama .com » Obamaphobia[...]…

Leave a Reply

Donate to Obama